USPTO serial 77577832
SUPEREYE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3986135Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 28, 2011
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUPEREYE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FREMONT, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco,, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Access control and alarm monitoring systems; Audio-video receivers; Automated systems, namely, software, hardware and communications devices for planning, scheduling, controlling, monitoring and providing information on transportation assets and parts thereof; Cameras; Car video recorders; Cellular phone usage detection system comprising a camera and a mobile phone signal receiving device; Combination video players and recorders; Computer cameras; Digital camera accessory in the nature of a digital photo viewer; Digital cameras; Digital entertainment systems for watching, storing and sharing digital content on a home computer network; Digital video recorders; Electronic apparatus, namely, motion detectors; Electronic detectors for observing and measuring the infrared spectrum, namely, infrared detectors; Electronic equipment for inspection and detection of foreign material within containers; Electronic imaging platforms in the field of inspection of semiconductor materials, namely, semiconductor wafers and reticles; Electronic instruments for use in remote inspection and measurement of industrial components using remote visual devices; Environmental enclosures, namely, structures specially adapted to hold and protect cameras from outdoor elements and tampering; Infrared cameras; Laser object detectors for use on vehicles; Laser scanners for industrial inspection; Laser speed detectors; Leak detectors for pumps and pipes; Lights for use on video cameras; Medical research equipment, namely, computers, gamma cameras, collimators, aperture plates and computer software, all sold together as a unit for use in high resolution, high sensitivity tomographic image processing and imaging in the field of nuclear medicine; Metal detectors; Motion picture cameras; Motion-picture cameras for self-developing film; Multiframe view cameras; Multiple purpose cameras; Optical inspection apparatus for industrial use; Optical inspection apparatus for inspection of semiconductor materials, namely, semiconductor wafers, reticles, and photomasks; Photographic cameras; Photographic flash units; Portable video cameras with built-in videocassette recorders; Radar detectors; Radar object detectors for use on vehicles; Remotely-controlled sub-aquatic video camera containing a TV camera, transmitter, receiver and microphone to record, detect, measure, survey and locate objects underwater; Safety sensors, namely, carbon monoxide detectors, smoke detectors, and combination carbon monoxide and smoke detectors; Smoke detectors; Television cameras; Televisions and video recorders; TV cameras; Ultrasonic flaw detectors; Ultrasonic object detectors for use on vehicles; Vehicle locating, tracking and security system comprised of an antenna and radio transmitter to be placed in a vehicle; Vehicle locator and recovery device programmed to use global positioning systems (GPS) and cellular telecommunications; Vehicle safety equipment, namely, an on-board vehicular surveillance system comprised of cameras and monitors for exposing and eliminating the blind spots on both sides of the vehicle; Vehicle safety equipment, namely, back-up sensors and cameras; Video cameras; Video monitors; Video multiplexers; Video receivers; Video recorders; Video telephones; Wireless communication device featuring voice, data and image transmission including voice, text and picture messaging, a video and still image camera, also functional to purchase music, games, video and software applications over the air for downloading to the device | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 12, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ADVANLINK INC
- Other trademarks owned by Forbest Technologies Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Forbest Technologies Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Forbest Technologies Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SUPEREYE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Oct 8, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 27, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 23, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 18, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 18, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 22, 2010 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 23, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 19, 2010 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 27, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |