USPTO serial 77578762
MCGLADREY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 24, 2011
- Examiner
- BUJA, SANDRA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MCGLADREY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BLOOMINGTON, MN
Bloomington, MN
Bloomington, MN
Bloomington, MN
Bloomington, MN
Bloomington, MN
Bloomington, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence R. Robins
LAWRENCE R. ROBINS FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER L.L901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4432UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in performing business administration functions; computer software for use in managing corporate human resources functions; computer software for use in managing corporate human resources processes; computer software for use in the management of financial transactions and financial planning; computer software for use in performing bookkeeping; computer software for use in conducting and managing corporate audits; computer software for use in conducting and managing financial audits; computer software for use in conducting and managing inventory audits; computer software for use in providing accounting services; computer software for use in conducing tax analysis; computer software for use in the facilitation of proper planning for the design, development, implementation and maintenance of computer and information systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 3, 2010 |
| 035 | accounting services; account and business auditing services; business administration services; tax preparation; tax advisory services, namely, consultation services; bookkeeping services; business management consulting services; government management consulting services, namely, providing information in the field of government affairs; advice relating to the organization and management of business, namely, assisting and advising others on the organization and management of businesses or business management of trading functions of commercial or industrial companies; economic forecasting and analysis, namely, economic research in the attainment of benefits, business interruption and loss determination for cost assessment services; employment counseling and recruiting; human resources management consulting services; personnel placement and recruitment services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 3, 2010 |
| 036 | insurance consultation and advisory services; financial planning, consulting and management services; insurance consultation, namely, providing advice relating to insurance issues; actuarial services; financial research, namely, research in the attainment of insurance and employee benefits; real estate investment services; financing services; individual retirement account services; general securities brokerage and investment banking services; financial planning and investment advisory and management services; consulting services in the field of employee benefits concerning insurance, finance and financial compensation programs; advice relating to the organization and management of business, namely, assisting and advising others on management of financial trading functions of commercial or industrial companies | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 3, 2010 |
| 042 | custom design and development of computer hardware, software and computer systems for others; consulting services in the field of computer based information systems for businesses and government; consulting services in the field of identification, prioritization, analysis, design, development and implementation of computer-based information systems for insurance and other financial services businesses and other industries; technical consulting services and assistance with computer-based information systems and components thereof; computer assurance services relating to the development of security systems and contingency planning for information systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 3, 2010 |
| 045 | litigation support in economics, accounting and finance, namely, investigative audits and financial analyses; tax advisory services, namely, tax compliance consulting relating to compliance with federal, state, and foreign tax laws and regulations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 3, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP
- Other trademarks owned by MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP
- Other trademarks owned by MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP
- Other trademarks owned by MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP
- Other trademarks owned by RSM MCGLADREY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RSM MCGLADREY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RSM MCGLADREY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named MCGLADREY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 30, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 24, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 16, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 21, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 16, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2010 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 10, 2010 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 10, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |