USPTO serial 77579477
LIP LOGIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUJA, SANDRA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIP LOGIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Sheehan Anderson
JENNIFER SHEEHAN ANDERSON HONIGMAN MILLER SCHWARTZ AND COHN LLP38500 WOODWARD AVE STE 100BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5048UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Lip balm and cosmetics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |