CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for OYSTER

USPTO serial 77580494

OYSTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TENG, SIMON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OYSTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nelson Blitz

NELSON BLITZ EXECUTIVE COUNSEL PLC2883 MACAO DRHERNDON, VA 20171-2115UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for securities and financial services compliance and risk assessment, namely, implementation and management of policies and procedures, and auditing, tracking and reporting of compliance for governance, regulatory and internal policy compliance, and risk assessment; Software to match financial advisors and wealth managers to securities broker dealersACTIVE—
035Consulting services, namely, business auditing for the securities and financial industry; business management consultancy for the securities and financial industry, namely, implementation of policies and procedures that are part of strategy plans; database management consulting services for tracking and reporting of compliance governance, regulatory and internal policy compliance for the securities and financial services industryACTIVE—
036Financial risk management consultationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 30, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 30, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 3, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 29, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 29, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 18, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 2, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 31, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 31, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 28, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 27, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance