Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 77580515?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/77580515. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns MIGHTY BITE?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 77580515, the listed owner(s) include: PTS Sales Company.

What is USPTO serial number 77580515?

Serial number 77580515 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark MIGHTY BITE. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover MIGHTY BITE?

The public record lists International Classes: 007. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

USPTO serial 77580515

MIGHTY BITE

Q: What is the current status of MIGHTY BITE?

MIGHTY BITE (77580515) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Sep 27, 2008
Status date: Feb 15, 2011
Registration date: —
Examiner: CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
Law office: LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIGHTY BITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

PTS Sales Company
Warren, MI
Other trademarks owned by PTS Sales Company

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arnold S. Weintraub

ARNOLD S. WEINTRAUB THE WEINTRAUB GROUP, P.L.C.28580 ORCHARD LAKE ROADSUITE 140FARMINGTON HILLS, MI 48334

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
007	Power drill bits which are sold through Applicant's retail establishments or through its catalogs	ACTIVE	Sep 1, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Feb 16, 2011	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Feb 15, 2011	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Feb 15, 2011	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Dec 28, 2010	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Sep 30, 2010	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Sep 30, 2010	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Sep 30, 2010	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Sep 20, 2010	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Sep 20, 2010	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 20, 2010	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2010	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Sep 20, 2010	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Sep 20, 2010	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Sep 20, 2010	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Jul 20, 2010	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Jul 20, 2010	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Jul 20, 2010	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Jun 23, 2010	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jun 23, 2010	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 23, 2010	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2010	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Jun 23, 2010	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
May 26, 2010	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 25, 2010	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 5, 2010	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Oct 27, 2009	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Oct 27, 2009	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 2009	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 5, 2009	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Oct 5, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 5, 2009	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2009	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Oct 5, 2009	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Aug 5, 2009	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 5, 2009	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 7, 2009	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2009	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2009	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2008	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Oct 1, 2008	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—