USPTO serial 77582790
FEM BAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 10, 2009
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FEM BAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mahsa Hakimi
Mahsa Hakimi HAKIMI LAW916 Kearny Street, Suite 604SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, conducting parties; Night clubs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 2, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Friedman, Eve E.
- Other trademarks owned by Friedman, Eve E.
- Other trademarks owned by Pinto, Shereen L.
- Other trademarks owned by Pinto, Shereen L.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named FEM BAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |