Drawing for SYNAPSE

USPTO serial 77583045

SYNAPSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SYNAPSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank V. Gallucci

Frank V. Gallucci FUJIFILM Holdings America Corporation200 Summit Lake DriveValhalla, NY 10595UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs for the management and generation of patient specific image related information for use by healthcare providers for reviewing and communicating of medical history and medical images for the primary diagnosis, treatment and care of patientsACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, designing software architecture for handling databases for the management and generation of patient specific image related information for use by healthcare providers for reviewing and communicationg of medical history and medical images for the primary diagnosis, treatment and care of patientsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 27, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 25, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 25, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 25, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 11, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 11, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 11, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 11, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 11, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 10, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 18, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 4, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 4, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 23, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 23, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 30, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 6, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance