USPTO serial 77583245
BTC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 12, 2010
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BTC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
New Brunswick, NJ
New Brunswick, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David H. McDonald
David H. McDonald Johnson & JohnsonONE JOHNSON & JOHNSON PLAZANEW BRUNSWICK, NJ 08933UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceutical preparations, namely, analgesics; decongestants; sinus preparations; allergy preparations; antihistamines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 27, 2009 |
| 044 | providing health information regarding health care and pharmaceutical preparations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 20, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 12, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 9, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |