Drawing for BEERUNCH

USPTO serial 77583419

BEERUNCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAVACHE, LINDA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEERUNCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sheila Fox Morrison

SHEILA FOX MORRISON DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP1300 SW 5TH AVESTE 2300PORTLAND, OR 97201-5682

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032BeerACTIVEApr 21, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 15, 2010MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 15, 2010ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 12, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2009CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2009SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 19, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 30, 2009IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 30, 2009EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 5, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 10, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 21, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 6, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 6, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 20, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 20, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 6, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance