USPTO serial 77583679
YIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Miaoli County, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kao H. Lu
Chun-Ming Shih HDLS Patent & Trademark ServiceP.O. Box 220746Chantilly, VA 20153UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Aromatherapy oils; Baby oil; Bath and shower gels and salts not for medical purposes; Bath oil; Bath soaps; Bathing lotions; Beauty creams; Cleansing milk; Essential oils; Essential oils for household use; Essential oils for personal use; Face and body lotions; Face and body milk; Hair shampoo; Hand lotions; Natural essential oils; Perfume; Perfume oils; Perfumed soap; Perfumery; Scented oils used to produce aromas when heated; Scented wood; Skin whitening creams | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | Candles; Scented candles; Scented wax for use in candle warmers | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Cook- and hold- ovens; Electric and battery operated aromatherapy units; Electric candle warmers; Electric coffee pots; Electric cooking pots; Electric cookware, namely, roasters; Electric deep fryers; Electric food warmers; Electric griddles; Electric kettles; Electric radiant heaters; Electric roasters; Electrical boilers | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Candle holders; Containers for household or kitchen use not of precious metal; Cooking pots; Cups and mugs; Earthenware basins; Earthenware mugs; Fragrance oil burners; Glass jars; Hot pots; Perfume atomizers, sold empty; Perfume burners; Perfume sprayers; Potpourri dishes | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Computerized on-line ordering featuring general merchandise and general consumer goods; Export and import agencies; Goods import-export agencies; Mail order services featuring housewares, consumer electronics, and general merchandise; On-line ordering services featuring housewares, consumer electronics, household appliances, general merchandise, groceries, soap and cleaning products, cosmetics and personal care products, scented candles, perfumery and perfumes, essential oils and perfume oils, and electric candle warmers; On-line retail store services featuring housewares, consumer electronics, household appliances, general merchandise, groceries, soap and cleaning products, cosmetics and personal care products, scented candles, perfumery and perfumes, essential oils and perfume oils, and electric candle warmers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hsiao, Ming Jen
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named YIA
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 12, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |