Drawing for LEAGUE OF LEGENDS CLASH OF FATES

USPTO serial 77583721

LEAGUE OF LEGENDS CLASH OF FATES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YARD, JOHN S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEAGUE OF LEGENDS CLASH OF FATES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Angela M. Martucci, Esq.

Angela M. Martucci, Esq. Davis & Gilbert LLP1740 BroadwayNew York, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game software; video game software; computer and video game software for use on console platforms, namely, global communications network capable and connectable systems for individual, peer-to-peer, online and multiplayer play; video game software for use on handheld game systems, mobile phones, portable USB drives and personal digital assistants; HD-DVD, optical and magneto-optical discs featuring computer games, movies based on computer games, and computer game-related content; DVDs, CDs, MP3s, and CD-ROMs featuring musical scores and dialogue; computer programs for use in tracking the status of various users of online interactive gaming services, and for matching online game players with other players of all skill levels; computer game programs for use in connection with multiplayer interactive games played over a global communication networkACTIVE—
016Printed matter, namely, comic books, strategy guides for games, trading cards, manuals for computer games, role playing game equipment in the nature of game book manualsACTIVE—
028Toys, namely, toy action figures and accessories therefor, mechanical action toys, toy vehicles and bendable toy figurines, role-playing games, role-playing toys, board games, card games, collectible toy figures, fantasy character toys, jigsaw puzzles, positionable toy figures, talking toys, three-dimensional puzzles, toy boxes, toy watches, toy weapons, two-dimensional puzzlesACTIVE—
038Providing on-line chat rooms and interactive discussion forums for gamers and computer game playersACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, providing an on-line computer game for others over global and local area computer networks; providing interactive online computer games via the World Wide Web; providing information about online computer games and video games via the World Wide Web; arranging and conducting competitions for video gamers and computer game players; multiplayer interactive computer and video games provided over the World Wide Web; providing tracking of users of online interactive gaming services and matching online game players with other players of all skill levels; arranging online computer and video game competitions for interactive game players; providing on-line trivia, tips and strategies for computer games; fan club servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 2, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 10, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 18, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 3, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 3, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 22, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 22, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 21, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 9, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 6, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance