USPTO serial 77583817
M CLUB. NINTENDO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3970987Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 31, 2011
- Examiner
- SHARMA, NAPOLEON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with M CLUB. NINTENDO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kyoto, JP
REDMOND, WA
REDMOND, WA
REDMOND, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerald E. Nagae
JERALD E. NAGAE Christensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3600Seattle, WA 98101-3029UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Card game toys and their accessories, namely, trading card games; hand-held games with liquid crystal displays; dolls; card games and their fittings, namely, equipment sold as a unit for playing card games; dice; chess games; dominoes; game machines and apparatus, namely, LCD game machines; billiard equipment; amusement game machines for use in amusement parks, excluding arcade video game machines; action skill games; action type target games; arcade-type electronic video games; articulated and non-articulated dolls; bath toys; board games; coin-operated video games; collectable toy figures; costume masks; electric action toys; electronic game equipment with a watch function; electronic interactive board games not for use with an external monitor; equipment sold as a unit for playing board games, flying discs; golf balls; hand-held games with liquid crystal displays; hand-held pinball games; hand-held units for playing electronic games; hand-held units for playing electronic games in the nature of a virtual pet; hand-held units for playing video games; hand-held video game systems, comprising hand-held units for playing video games and associated game cartridges or game memory cards packaged as a unit; inflatable toys; interactive board games not for use with an external monitor; jacks; jigsaw puzzles; kites; manipulative games; manipulative puzzles; music box toys; musical toys; nonelectric hand-held action skill games; paper dolls; parlor games; party favors in the nature of small toys; play figures; plush dolls; plush toys; positionable toy figures; promotional game cards; pull toys; punching toys; puppets; push toys; remote control toy cars; ride-on toys; role playing games; roller skates; rubber action balls; rubber character toys; spinning tops; stand alone video game machines; stuffed toys; swimming aids, namely, pool rings and arm floats for recreational use; toy action balls; toy action figures; toy bakeware and cookware; toy balloons; toy banks; toy binoculars; toy building blocks; toy cap pistols; toy clocks and watches; toy construction playsets; toy decorative wind socks; toy figurines; toy key chains with and without sound device; toy mobiles; toy musical instruments; toy punching bags; toy tea sets; toy vehicles; toy whistles; toys for pets; trading card games; water squirting toys; wind-up toys; yo-yos; toys for domestic pets; sports equipment, namely, golf balls, in-line skates, jump ropes, roller skates, skateboards, snowboards, snow skis and sports balls | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 9, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nintendo Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named M CLUB. NINTENDO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 31, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 27, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 2, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2010 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 2, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 4, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |