USPTO serial 77584292
CASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBB, SCOTT
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
KNAPP LOGISTIK AUTOMATION GMBH
A-8075 Hart bei Graz, AT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CECELIA M. PERRY
CECELIA M. PERRY MCGLEW AND TUTTLE, P.C.SCARBOROUGH STASCARBOROUGH, NY 10510UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Storage systems comprised of conveyors and cartooning machines, namely, conveyors in the form of conveyor belts, modular plastic conveyor, tooth belt conveyor, V-belt conveyor, drag chain conveyor, roller conveyor, belt driven live roller conveyor, roller accumulation conveyor, multiple belt conveyor, empty carton conveyor, tapered roller curve conveyor, turning belts for machines, and component replacement parts for the aforesaid goods, all for use in commissioning plants; sorting machines with production line lane combiner; semi-automatic order processing system with shuttles with a load handling device, a lift, a rack systems and a picking station; conveyor installations comprised of belt conveyor, conveyor belt, modular plastic conveyor, tooth belt conveyor, V-belt conveyor, drag chain conveyer, roller conveyor, belt driven live roller conveyor, roller accumulation conveyor, shoe sorter, lane combiner, multiple belt conveyor, empty carton conveyor, tapered roller curve, belt turn, diverters, all for use in commissioning plants, and component parts for use therein; components for the aforesaid systems and installations | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Computer hardware, data processors, and industrial process control software for use in the fields of storage engineering, conveying and commissioning technology, namely, warehouse management systems, control-systems for conveyor system, control-systems for picking system, electronic measuring, regulating, control and security devices for use in conveying units and machines in commissioning plants, namely, belt conveyor, conveyor belt, modular plastic conveyor, tooth belt conveyor, V-belt conveyor, drag chain conveyer, roller conveyor, belt driven live roller conveyor, roller accumulation conveyor, shoe sorter, lane combiner, multiple belt conveyor, empty carton conveyor, tapered roller curve, belt turn, diverters; electronic sensors for use in measuring, regulating and controlling temperatures and security burglar alarms for use in storage systems, conveying units and machines in commissioning plants | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Creation, development, further development, maintenance, updating, design and installation of software for use in storage systems, conveyors and commissioning installations, technical consultancy with regard to the application of the aforesaid software; technical project studies and development of computers and computer hardware for use in storage systems, conveyors and commissioning installations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |