Drawing for THE HACKER'S GUIDE TO GOLF

USPTO serial 77584785

THE HACKER'S GUIDE TO GOLF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HABEEB, MYRIAH A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE HACKER'S GUIDE TO GOLF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bradley J. Walz

BRADLEY J. WALZ WINTHROP & WEINSTINE, P.A.225 S 6TH STSTE 3500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4629

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Providing ratings of the quality of golf coursesACTIVEJan 19, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2010MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 26, 2010ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 25, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 9, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2009AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 7, 2009IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 6, 2009EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2008TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Dec 10, 2008PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance