USPTO serial 77585530
INVENTING THE FUTURE YOU LIVE IN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INVENTING THE FUTURE YOU LIVE IN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services and on-line retail store services featuring solar panels, solar collectors and solar powered energy storage batteries | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Electricity supply services, namely, electricity distribution; customer support services, namely, providing information in relation to electricity distribution | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacturing for others of solar panels, solar collectors and solar powered energy storage batteries; Electricity supply services, namely, electricity generation; Customer support services, namely, providing information in relation to electricity generation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2015 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 12, 2014 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 30, 2014 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 8, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |