USPTO serial 77586231
FAT HEAD'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HELFMAN, JUDITH MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FAT HEAD'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pittsburgh, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Russell D. Orkin, Reg. No. 25,363
RUSSELL D. ORKIN THE WEBB LAW FIRM700 KOPPERS BUILDING436 SEVENTH AVENUEPITTSBURGH, PA 15219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, jackets, head wear, underwear, sleepwear and sweatshirts | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 25, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 25, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |