USPTO serial 77586573
FREETRIPLESCORE.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FREETRIPLESCORE.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James H. Donoian
JAMES H DONOIAN GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP200 PARK AVE FL 34NEW YORK, NY 10166-0005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Administration of a membership program enabling the participants to check and monitor their credit reports and scores, through membership enrollment | ACTIVE | May 23, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |