Drawing for SYNGEST

USPTO serial 77587242

SYNGEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SYNGEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Aaron D. Hendelman

AARON D. HENDELMAN WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001anhydrous ammonia for use in a wide variety of fields, not for cleaning purposes; anhydrous ammonia fertilizer; hydrogen gas for use in a wide variety of fields; anhydrous ammonia from biomass, not for cleaning purposes; hydrogen gas from biomassACTIVE—
004biofuels; renewable fuelsACTIVE—
011renewable energy systems, namely, biofuel systems comprising of a waste-heat boiler and apparatus for the production of anhydrous ammonia and hydrogen gas and the production, conduction, distribution, processing, and regulation of electric energyACTIVE—
040generation of electricity; production, treatment and refinement of biofuels for others; production, treatment and refinement of renewable fuels for others; production of fuels and energy from biological and other renewable sources; processing of biofuels; production of fuel, namely, production of ammonia from biomass; production of fuel, namely, production of hydrogen gas from biomassACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 12, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 24, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 23, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 5, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 28, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 27, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 26, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 26, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 12, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 8, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 8, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 12, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 1, 2010TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Sep 1, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 1, 2010OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Nov 18, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 18, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 1, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 18, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 18, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 18, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 8, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 31, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
May 19, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 14, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 13, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 13, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 13, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 13, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 6, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 6, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 1, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 8, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 11, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 10, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance