USPTO serial 77587648
VIDABODE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOVELACE, JAMES B
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIDABODE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Amherst, Nova Scotia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard G. Martin
Richard G. Martin Fraser Clemens Martin & Miller LLC28366 Kensington LanePerrysburg, OH 43551UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | additives for use in the manufacture of concrete; agglutinates for concrete; concrete binding agents; mold-release compounds for use in concrete fabrication | ACTIVE | — |
| 002 | Colour pigments for concrete; coating materials, namely, paints, stains and varnishes for interior and exterior use on a variety of substrates | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | Parts and fittings, of metal, for use in assembly of concrete products, namely, butt-joint fasteners, harnesses used in the moving and/or transfer of concrete panels, curing and conveyance system for use in the fabrication and manufacture of concrete and concrete products, distribution head for batching composite in the fabrication and manufacture of concrete and concrete products, clamps, metal fasteners, namely, metal pressure plates, screws, nails; metal moulds for forming cement products, namely, precast structural beams, flooring, walls and panels | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, brochures, advertising, flyers of licensees, contractors and third party stakeholders in the field of construction and building technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Concrete; cementacious material for building purposes; structural beams not of metal; flooring, walls and panels of concrete composite not of metal; concrete blocks, concrete retaining wall, curtain wall not of metal; concrete slabs, non-metal moulds for forming concrete products, namely, pre-cast structural beams, flooring, walls and panels | ACTIVE | — |
| 022 | Parts and fittings, not of metal for use in assembly of concrete products, namely, butt-joint fasteners, harnesses used in the moving and/or transfer of concrete panels, curing and conveyance system for use in the fabrication and manufacture of concrete and concrete products, distribution head for batching composite in the fabrication and manufacture of concrete and concrete products | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing training to licensees, contractors and third party stakeholders in the implementation and manufacture of concrete fabrication processes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design of manufacturing and fabrication facilities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Vidabode Group Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VIDABODE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |