USPTO serial 77587679
ARTHOUSE CHOCOLATES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARTHOUSE CHOCOLATES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank J. Gilbert
FRANK J. GILBERT SCHWARTZ & CERA LLP44 MONTGOMERY STSTE 3850SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-4823Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Hot beverage mixes, namely, vegetable-based or dairy-based chocolate food beverages; chocolate milk | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Chocolate, chocolate bars, chocolate candy, artisan chocolates, chocolate food products, namely, chocolate-based ready-to-eat food bars and chocolate covered fruit, raisins and matzoh, candies, confections, bon-bons, chocolate truffles, candy bars, toffee, chocolate dragee nuts, hot beverage mixes, namely, chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based, and gift boxes containing chocolate and candy | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services and online retail store services featuring chocolate, chocolate bars, chocolate candy, artisan chocolates, chocolate food products, candies, confections, bon-bons, truffles, candy bars, toffee, dragee nuts, chocolate covered nuts, hot beverage mixes, mugs, trays, clothing, and gift boxes containing chocolate and candy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ArtHouse Chocolates, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ArtHouse Chocolates, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named ARTHOUSE CHOCOLATES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 13, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 19, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 5, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 10, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |