Drawing for CRITTER POUCHES

USPTO serial 77587883

CRITTER POUCHES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TRIPI, CYNTHIA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CRITTER POUCHES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James H. Walters

JAMES H. WALTERS PATENTTM.USPO BOX 82788PORTLAND, OR 97282-0788UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Hygiene protection system, namely, covers made of textile based materials for door knobs, door handles and door handle levers to reduce transfer of bacteria, disease, microbes, microorganisms, parasites, pathogens, viruses; barriers, namely, textile based barriers for providing barrier between door handles, door levers and door knobs and a person's hands; door handle covers made of textile for use in hospitals and health care facilities for reducing transfer of bacteria, disease, microbes, microorganisms, parasites, pathogens, viruses, harmful diseases; door handle covers made of cloth for use in restaurant, hotel, resorts, cruise ships and hospitality facilities for reducing transfer of bacteria, disease, microbes, microorganisms, parasites, pathogens, viruses, harmful diseases; door handle covers made of cloth for use in home and office for reducing transfer of bacteria, disease, microbes, microorganisms, parasites, pathogens, viruses, harmful diseases;covers made of textile based materials for cell phones, PDAs, personal electronic devices, music players, MP3 players, electronic devices; textile based barriers for providing barrier between cell phones, PDAs, personal electronic devices, music players, MP3 players, electronic devices and a person's hands; cell phone, PDA, personal electronic device, music player, electronic device and MP3 player covers made of textile; cell phones, PDAs, personal electronic devices, music players, electronic device and MP3 players covers made of clothACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 9, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 11, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 10, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance