USPTO serial 77588143
WORLD LEADER IN SAFE AUTOMATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 25, 2009
- Examiner
- GAAFAR, SAMIR MICHAEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WORLD LEADER IN SAFE AUTOMATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher M. Brock
CHRISTOPHER M. BROCK HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C.PO BOX 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48303-0828UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Installation, maintenance, and repair of electric or electronic apparatus, equipment and devices used for automated or partly automated industrial installations; providing technical support, namely, technical advice concerning the installation, repair and maintenance of electric or electronic apparatus, equipment, and devices used for automated or partly automated industrial installations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2008 |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, instruction in the field of industrial automation technology and in the field of industrial safety technology; training services in the field of industrial automation technology and in the field of industrial safety technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2008 |
| 042 | Consultation services in the field of industrial automation technology; consultation services in the field of industrial safety technology; custom design, engineering, and development of electric or electronic apparatus, equipment, and devices used for automated or partly automated industrial installations; computer programming for others in the field of industrial automation technology and in the field of industrial safety technology; computer services, namely, microcontroller programming for others in the field of industrial automation technology and in the field of industrial safety technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pilz GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Pilz GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WORLD LEADER IN SAFE AUTOMATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 20, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2009 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 15, 2009 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |