USPTO serial 77588253
EQUAL FOOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BESCH, JAY C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EQUAL FOOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MIAMI BEACH, FL
MIAMI BEACH, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael Greenberg
MICHAEL GREENBERG MICHAEL I GREENBERG PA6647 SW 65TH TERMIAMI, FL 33143-3223UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Electronic commerce services, namely, providing information products via telecommunication networks for advertising and sales purposes; electronic processing of orders for others; infomediary services, namely, facilitating transactions between buyers and sellers through providing buyers with information about sellers, goods, and/or services | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Maintaining escrow accounts for buyers and sellers via a global computer information network; administering the issuance, redemption and exchange of monetary transactions, namely, issuance of bank checks, issuing of checks and letters of credit, monetary exchange, and administration of transactions involving funds drawn from securities, stocks, funds, equities, bonds, cash, or other types of financial investments using a check or negotiable order of withdrawal, all for others via a global computer information network; electronic bill payment services provided by means of the global information network; financial services in the nature of a payment system for businesses and consumers for the purchase of goods and services, namely, a financial clearing house between financial institutions and merchants; financial clearing house between corporations; merchant credit card transaction and payment processing services; money transfer services, electronic funds transfer services; escrow services, namely, maintaining escrow accounts for investments, maintaining mortgage escrow accounts, online escrow services for the exchange of services, and real estate escrow services; bill payment services | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Alternative dispute resolution services provided on-line | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EQUAL FOOT LLC
- Other trademarks owned by EQUAL FOOT LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named EQUAL FOOT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 27, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 24, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 27, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 27, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 1, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |