USPTO serial 77588444
"I BELIEVE"
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with "I BELIEVE"?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Easy Pha-Max Marketing Sdn. Bhd.
Selangor Darul Ehsan, MY
Easy Pha-Max Marketing Sdn. Bhd.
Selangor Darul Ehsan, MY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harold L. Novick
HAROLD L. NOVICK THE NATH LAW GROUP112 S WEST STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2825UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Magnetically encoded cards containing information of members in a loyalty program for customers | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Paper, cardboard and goods made from these materials, namely, copier paper, cardboard boxes, carton boxes, cardboard liners, cardboard dividers; calendars; printed advertising boards of paper or cardboard; adhesive for stationery or household purposes; albums for photographs; almanacs; bags of paper or plastic for household use; bags of paper or plastic for packaging; banners and signboards of paper and cardboard; binders; bookmarkers; bottle envelopes or wrappers of cardboard or paper; boxes of cardboard or paper; bubble packs of plastic for packaging; brochures in the field of health supplements and health beverages products; calendars; catalogues in the field of health supplements and health beverages products; printed charts; envelopes; graphic prints; graphic representations; printed invoices; note books; plastic materials for packaging, namely, plastic bubble packs, plastic bags; printed prospectus; printed informational cards in the field of health supplements and health beverages products; printed forms; paper labels; letterhead paper; manuals, namely, handbooks in the field of health supplements and health beverages products; paper file jackets; magazines, newsletters, and pamphlets in the field health supplements and health beverages products; informational flyers featuring information on health supplements and health beverages products; paperweights; pen and pencils; pen and pencil cases and holders; printed paper signs; desktop document stands; stationery; stickers; tags of paper; printed teaching materials not including apparatus in the field of health supplements and health beverages products; wrapping materials, namely, gift wrap paper; printed tickets; writing paper | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Easy Pha-Max Marketing Sdn. Bhd.
- Other trademarks owned by Easy Pha-Max Marketing Sdn. Bhd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named "I BELIEVE"
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 19, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 17, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |