USPTO serial 77588606
TIWI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4142943Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 15, 2012
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TIWI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Valley City, UT
INTHINC TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.
Dallas, TX
Other trademarks owned by INTHINC TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.
West Valley City, UT
INTHINC TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.
WEST VALLEY CITY, UT
Other trademarks owned by INTHINC TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Event data recorders; computer hardware and software for recording, monitoring and analysis of data relating to vehicle information, driver behavior, vehicle location information and events occurring during vehicle operation and transfer of same between computers and on-board vehicle information recording device; software for monitoring and evaluating driver behaviors and vehicle performance and efficiency and for use in processing and assessing risk factors, risk indexes and scores associated with driver behavior or fleet management; computer hardware and software for accessing driver performance data and information generated by drivers of vehicles and monitoring vehicles when driver behavior exceeds or meets pre-programmed parameters related to vehicle operation; computer hardware and software for sending real time alerts via satellite, wireless and cellular transmission notifying of change in status of driver behavior which exceeds or meets pre-programmed parameters; hardware and software for in-car telephone calling; vehicle safety equipment and hardware, namely, 24 hour emergency assistance unit comprised of an cellular telephone, computer hardware and computer software for use in transmitting voice messages and data, and for use in transmitting emergency alerts, vehicle location and other data relevant to providing vehicle or emergency services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Providing driver safety education to individuals and companies, namely, providing group and individual instruction in the field of driver safety featuring in-vehicle feedback systems and driving performance management; providing driver safety training featuring use of on-board hardware and software to recover, analyze, and assess driver performance, risk factors and events occurring during vehicle operation; educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, and workshops in the field of motor vehicle safety, driver safety and safe driving; driver safety training; vehicle driving instruction, namely, driving instruction for land vehicles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for use in processing data and information, namely, analyzing collected audio, video, text and digital content received from on-board vehicle computer system related to driver behavior and habits, vehicle information, road conditions and analysis of such data and information for reporting and storage in a database; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for customers to remotely access information and data related to driving habits and behavior of an operator of a particular vehicle, technical and mechanical operating information of the vehicle, road conditions and to manage, administer, modify and control parameters for collection of data and information from on-board vehicle computer system | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | Providing a database of driver behavior establishing a driver risk index and driver risk scores for the purpose of improving driver safety and reducing risky driver behavior | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by inthinc, inc.
- Other trademarks owned by INTHINC TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by inthinc, inc.
- Other trademarks owned by INTHINC TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named TIWI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 15, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 15, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 13, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 6, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 21, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 25, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 26, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 7, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |