USPTO serial 77588710
MEETMETROPHOENIX.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBBINS, ODESSA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEETMETROPHOENIX.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Maricopa Partnership for Arts and Culture
Phoenix, AZ
Other trademarks owned by Maricopa Partnership for Arts and Culture
Maricopa Partnership for Arts and Culture
Phoenix, AZ
Other trademarks owned by Maricopa Partnership for Arts and Culture
Metro Phoenix Partnership for Arts and Culture
Phoenix, AZ
Other trademarks owned by Metro Phoenix Partnership for Arts and Culture
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer A. Van Kirk
JENNIFER A. VAN KIRK LEWIS AND ROCA LLP40 N CENTRAL AVE STE 1900PHOENIX, AZ 85004-4446UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing a web site with information regarding and highlighting arts, culture, entertainment, dining and other points of interest in the greater Phoenix, Arizona metropolitan area | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Maricopa Partnership for Arts and Culture
- Other trademarks owned by Maricopa Partnership for Arts and Culture
- Other trademarks owned by Metro Phoenix Partnership for Arts and Culture
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named MEETMETROPHOENIX.COM
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 25, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 26, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |