Drawing for MAGIC CENTER OF EXCELLENCE

USPTO serial 77588810

MAGIC CENTER OF EXCELLENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KERTGATE, AMY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAGIC CENTER OF EXCELLENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen J. Strauss

STEPHEN J. STRAUSS FULWIDER PATTON LLP6060 CENTER DR FL 10LOS ANGELES, CA 90045-1598UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Employment agency services; employee leasing; employment related services, namely, providing job placement, career development, employment recruitment, and general employment information to others; career development services, namely, personnel placement and employment recruitment; providing information and consultancy services on the procurement of temporary, contract, and permanent personnel; employment counseling; employment staffing in the field of workforce development; providing career information via a website on a global information network; providing information on jobs via a website on a global information networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 7, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 23, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Feb 22, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 21, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 11, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 10, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 7, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 7, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 13, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 12, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 7, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 1, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Aug 31, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 31, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 30, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 30, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 9, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 7, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 7, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 7, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 13, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 23, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 7, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 7, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 3, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 2, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 12, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 9, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 9, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 13, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 12, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 22, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 25, 2008AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 14, 2008PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance