Drawing for S SWAGGER LIKE US INC.

USPTO serial 77589920

S SWAGGER LIKE US INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PATE, TARA J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with S SWAGGER LIKE US INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ralph G. De Palma III, Esq.

BRAD D ROSE Ralph G. De Palma III, Esq., PC7 Times Square, 40th floorNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025(Filed without Basis) Bibs not of cloth or paper(Based on Intent to Use) Belts; Caps; Jerseys; Leather belts; Short sets; Ties; Tops; Wearable garments and clothing, namely, shirtsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 10, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 4, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 27, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 3, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2009ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 30, 2009UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 26, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 14, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance