USPTO serial 77590065
THE CRUSH BY TIFFANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE CRUSH BY TIFFANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. Lee Fraley
R. Lee Fraley SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.400 E. Van BurenPhoenix, AZ 86004-2202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bath and body products, namely, body deodorants; shampoos | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Optical apparatuses and instruments, namely, range finders, binoculars, firearm scopes, namely, gun scopes, rifle scopes, spotting scopes; Electronic devices for animal locating and tracking programmed to use global positioning systems (GPS); Global positioning system (GPS); Global positioning system (GPS) consisting of computers, computer software, transmitters, receivers, and network interface devices; Pre-recorded CDs, video tapes, laser disks and DVDs featuring live game hunting; Downloadable multimedia files containing artwork, text, audio, video, games, and Internet Web links relating to live game hunting; chronographs, namely, specialized time recording apparatuses | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | All terrain vehicle after market replacement parts and accessories, namely, mud flaps, fenders, steering wheel covers, wheel covers, seat covers, fitted and semi-fitted vehicle covers, hub caps, hub cap covers, pannier bags for all terrain vehicles, and seat cushions | ACTIVE | — |
| 013 | Firearms, gun cases, sights for firearms, replacement stocks/forearms for firearms, shoulder sling straps for firearms, chokes for firearms, recoil pads for firearms | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Duffel bags, waist bags, back packs | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Gloves, hats, boots, headgear in the nature of face masks, namely, toboggan hats, ski masks, skull caps and snow caps to keep the face warm during outdoor activities, jackets, shirts, pants, sweatshirts, vests, parkas, rainwear | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Hunting game calls, namely, mouth calls, box calls, electronic calls, grunt calls; implements for archery, namely, bows, open bow sights, non-telescopic bow sights, rests, releases, stabilizers, cases, arrows, broad heads, arrow wraps, arrow fletching devices, namely, fins, vanes and feathers attached near the back of arrows, bow strings; animal hunting decoys and accessories therefor, namely, non-motorized decoy bodies; hunting blinds; hunting stands; hunting sling shots; hunter's scent camouflage, namely, human odor cover scents for use in hunting | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Television entertainment, namely, production of television shows | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lakosky, Tiffany
- Other trademarks owned by Lakosky, Tiffany
- Other trademarks owned by Lakosky, Lee
- Other trademarks owned by Lakosky, Lee
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 013
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named THE CRUSH BY TIFFANY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 5, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 17, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 8, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |