USPTO serial 77591489
SYMOZAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SYMOZAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Laval, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George G. Grigel
GEORGE G. GRIGEL PAINE HAMBIEN LLP717 W. SPRAGUE AVENUESUITE 1200SPOKANE, WA 99201-3807Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, AN ANTIDEPRESSANT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |