USPTO serial 77591527
TEEN DRIVING COUNCIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TEEN DRIVING COUNCIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
West Valley City, UT
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed publications, namely, brochures, pamphlets, newsletters, booklets, training kits and posters in the field of driver safety, motor vehicle safety and the promotion of safe driving | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Promoting public awareness of the need for safe driving training through educational campaigns and the distribution of educational and informational literature and materials, namely, handouts, brochures, pamphlets, posters and advertisements to teach the general public about driver safety and safe driving | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, and workshops in the field of motor vehicle safety, driver safety and safe driving; driver safety training; vehicle driving instruction, namely, driving instruction for land vehicles; providing a website featuring information and resources in the fields of motor vehicle safety, driver safety and safe driving | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |