USPTO serial 77591645
RUGMONSTER CARPET & UPHOLSTERY CLEANING "WE SCARE DIRT"
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 16, 2009
- Examiner
- BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RUGMONSTER CARPET & UPHOLSTERY CLEANING "WE SCARE DIRT"?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MT IRON, MN
MT. IRON, MN
Clayton, CA
Clayton, CA
Clayton, CA
Clayton, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terry L. Thompson
TERRY L. THOMPSON LAW OFFICE OF TERRY L. THOMPSONPO BOX 1346ALAMO, CA 94507-7346UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Carpet and rug cleaning; Carpet cleaning; Grouting services; Rug cleaning | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Perrey, Lynn M.
- Other trademarks owned by Perrey, Edward W.
- Other trademarks owned by Perrey, Edward W.
- Other trademarks owned by Perrey, Edward W.
- Other trademarks owned by Perrey, Lynn M.
- Other trademarks owned by Perrey, Lynn M.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named RUGMONSTER CARPET & UPHOLSTERY CLEANING "WE SCARE DIRT"
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |