USPTO serial 77591721
BILL HICKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BILL HICKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew T. Beckett
KENT M. MARCUS KMM, P.C.21 MUSIC SQ. W.,1ST FLOORPO BOX 120434NASHVILLE, TN 37203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts; Sweat shirts; Baseball caps | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |