USPTO serial 77592195
ONENESS CHANNEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3798166Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 8, 2010
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ONENESS CHANNEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Singapore, SG
Singapore, SG
Singapore, SG
LONDON, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Morgan
Robert J. Morgan Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, LLP41 S. HIGH ST.Suite 2900COLUMBUS, OH 43215Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Religious and spiritual services, namely, providing gatherings and retreats to develop and enhance the spiritual lives of individuals and spiritual rehabilitation services; conducting religious prayer services; evangelistic and ministerial services; ministerial services, namely, holding spiritual retreats to assist religious leaders to develop and enhance their spiritual lives; charitable outreach services, namely, providing counseling services in the field of religion; providing on-line information in the field of spirituality, self-help, and personal empowerment subject matters | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by For World Peace Pte Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by For World Peace Pte Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by For World Peace Pte Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by OWA HOLDINGS LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named ONENESS CHANNEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 8, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 4, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 4, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 29, 2010 | ISPO | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |