USPTO serial 77592421
Serial No. 77592421
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 25, 2014
- Examiner
- CARL III, FRED
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 77592421?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MARKHAM, ONTARIO, CA
Richmond Hill Ontario, CA
Richmond Hill Ontario, CA
Richmond Hill Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew S. Ehard
ANDREW S. EHARD MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.PO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Diagnostic assays and test kits comprised of primers, probes, buffers, and reagents for use in laboratory and chemical research and development and used to predict diseases | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Diagnostic assays and test kits comprised of primers, probes, buffers, and reagents for clinical use to diagnose, prognose or treat diseases | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Medical diagnostic services, namely, diagnosing, preventing and predicting disease, identifying risk factors of disease, prognostic testing, gene and protein testing, identifying physiological characteristics, and evaluating efficacy of treatment; medical diagnostic services, namely, establishing individual preventative care programs, establishing disease treatment based on gene and protein expression and activity, evaluating clinical trial progress, and drug monitoring and monitoring of patient health progression; providing genomic, proteomic and gene expression profiles useful in selecting therapeutics, evaluating the efficacy and toxicity of treatments and evaluating treatment progression, prognosing disease or disease progression and identifying disease heredity risk factors; computer services, namely, computer tracking of and providing access to databases of life sciences information via global, national and local computer networks in the field of pharmacogenomics, diagnostics, personalized medicine and toxicogenomics | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GENENEWS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by GeneNews Limited
- Other trademarks owned by GeneNews Limited
- Other trademarks owned by GeneNews Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 19, 2014 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 21, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 1, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |