USPTO serial 77593042
PLAYPORTT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLAYPORTT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Adams
ROBERT W. ADAMS Nixon & Vanderhye, P.C.901 North Glebe Rd., 11th FloorARLINGTON, VA 22203-1808UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Repair and installation of game and entertainment and music systems, digital jukeboxes and related accessories, namely, computer hardware and software, satellite, wire, cable or optical fiber telecommunication networks, disks, speakers, digital sound boards, touch screens, display monitors, mouse keyboards and computer cables | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 28, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2013 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2013 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2013 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 17, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2012 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 2, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 14, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 22, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | INOA | AMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 4, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2008 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |