USPTO serial 77594140
ORGANIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3820162Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 20, 2010
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ORGANIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Todd Christopher International Inc.
Oldsmar, FL
Other trademarks owned by Todd Christopher International Inc.
ZUG, CH
Todd Christopher International Inc.
Oldsmar, FL
Other trademarks owned by Todd Christopher International Inc.
Todd Christopher International Inc.
Oldsmar, FL
Other trademarks owned by Todd Christopher International Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RACHELLE LAROCHE MILLER
RACHELLE LAROCHE MILLER JOHNSON & JOHNSONONE JOHNSON & JOHNSON PLAZANEW BRUNSWICK, NJ 08933UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Organic hair care products, namely, hair shampoos, hair conditioners, hair gels, hair mousses, hair sprays, hair care preparations, hair care lotions, hair creams, hair waiving lotions, non-medicated hair serums, hair dressings, hair emollients, hair nourishers, hair oils, hair relaxers, non-medicated hair repair treatments, non-medicated hair care treatments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 22, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Todd Christopher International Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CILAG GMBH INTERNATIONAL
- Other trademarks owned by Todd Christopher International Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Todd Christopher International Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named ORGANIX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 4, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 14, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 27, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |