USPTO serial 77594292
UNIVERSITY OF CLEVELAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3735435Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 5, 2010
- Examiner
- IMAM, AMEEN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UNIVERSITY OF CLEVELAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John M. Skeriotis
MICHAEL C DEJOHN1111 SUPERIOR AVENUESUITE 310CLEVELAND, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services, namely, providing seminars, workshops, classes, and lecture in the fields of postsecondary and higher education in the field of information technology | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Sep 20, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2014 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 5, 2014 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 30, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | GNR1 | NOTIFICATION OF DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | GNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |