Drawing for SONATEST

USPTO serial 77595551

SONATEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SONATEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric J. von Vorys

Eric J. von Vorys Shulman Rogers Gandal Pordy & Ecker, P.A.12505 Park Potomac AvenueSixth FloorPotomac, MD 20854

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Ultrasonic flaw detectors; ultrasonic sensors; ultrasonic thickness gauges; ultrasonic coating gaugesACTIVE—
042Testing of ultrasonic equipment; research and development of new products in the nature of non-destructive testing equipment and apparatus to test materials for flawsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 17, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 15, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 10, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 10, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 17, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 15, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 12, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 12, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 21, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 10, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 10, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 21, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 21, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 14, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 14, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 25, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 21, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 21, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 21, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 22, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 23, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 22, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance