USPTO serial 77595989
DRY TOUCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DRY TOUCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grand Rapids, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. W. Reick
H. W. REICK PRICE, HENEVELD, COOPER, DEWITT & LITTON695 KENMOOR S.E.P.O. BOX 2567GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | TEETH WHITENING FILMS AND TRAYS CONTAINING TEETH WHITENING PREPARATIONS | ACTIVE | Feb 10, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |