Drawing for THE PERFECT FOOD

USPTO serial 77597198

THE PERFECT FOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LITZAU, MICHAEL
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE PERFECT FOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Manuel Valcarcel

Manuel Valcarcel Greenberg Traurig, P.A.1221 Brickell AvenueMiami, FL 33131UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Empanadas; Meat Turnovers; Fruit Turnovers; Apple TurnoversABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2009MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 12, 2009ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jul 27, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 11, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 25, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 25, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 20, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 19, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance