USPTO serial 77597879
THE BLEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE BLEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mayfield Hts., OH
Mayfield Hts., OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay F. Moldovanyi
Jay F. Moldovanyi FAY SHARPE LLP1228 Euclid AvenueThe Halle Building, 5th FloorCleveland, OH 44115Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing an online directory information service featuring information regarding, and in the nature of, directory information about action sports, general interest, classifieds, virtual community, social networking, photo sharing and transmission of photographic images; advertising and information distribution services, namely, providing classified advertising space via the global computer network; promoting the goods and services of others over the internet; and, providing online computer databases and online searchable databases in the field of classifieds | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | providing online chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among users in the field of action sports and general interest; providing instant message services and transmission of photographic images; providing online computer databases and online searchable databases in the field of transmission of photographic images | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, hosting online web facilities for others for organizing and conducting online meetings, gatherings and interactive discussions; computer services in the nature of customized web pages featuring user defined information, personal profiles and information; providing online computer databases and online searchable databases in the field of virtual communities, namely, databases relating to creating online communities where registered users can form virtual communities; providing online computer databases and online searchable databases in the field of photo and video sharing, namely, databases where users can upload, exchange and share photos and videos; providing virtual community computer services, namely, creating an online community for registered users to form virtual communities; and photo sharing services, namely, providing a web site that gives computer users the ability to upload, exchange and share photos | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | providing online computer databases and online searchable databases in the field of social networking; providing social networking; providing social networking services online | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Blend LLC
- Other trademarks owned by The Blend LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named THE BLEND
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 24, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 22, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 9, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |