Drawing for TAG-IT

USPTO serial 77599044

TAG-IT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TAG-IT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maury M. Tepper, III

MAURY M. TEPPER, III TEPPER & EYSTER, PLLC3724 BENSON DRIVERALEIGH, NC 27609UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042information technology services, namely, computer hardware and software consulting and support services, data hosting services and web site hosting services provided to non-profit organizations, hospitals and senior living providersABANDONEDAug 5, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2010MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 1, 2010ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 1, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 1, 2010OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 14, 2010OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 7, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 10, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 30, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 28, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 19, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 12, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Aug 28, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 25, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 6, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 21, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 15, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 27, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance