Drawing for VENEERSTONE

USPTO serial 77600178

VENEERSTONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VENEERSTONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert J. Morgan

Robert J. Morgan Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, LLP41 S. High StreetSuite 2900Columbus, OH 43215

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Decorative manufactured stoneACTIVEDec 8, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 25, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 24, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 24, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 3, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 3, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 9, 2012EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 8, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 16, 2011RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Jul 26, 2011GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2011GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 2, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 4, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 4, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 6, 2010GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Oct 6, 2010GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Oct 6, 2010CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Sep 14, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 15, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 21, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 21, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 28, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 28, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance