Drawing for TESTMARK

USPTO serial 77600310

TESTMARK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAPPENFIELD, ANN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TESTMARK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sandra Epp Ryan

SANDRA EPP RYAN FAEGRE & BENSON LLP90 SOUTH SEVENTH STREET2200 WELLS FARGO CENTERMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Power tools and accessories, namely, hedge trimmers and blowersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 16, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 13, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 13, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 30, 2010CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Mar 8, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 24, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 24, 2010DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 22, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 18, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 18, 2009DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2009ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 13, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 21, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 1, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 18, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 18, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 16, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 16, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 28, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance