USPTO serial 77600573
CUDDLY SOFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BESCH, JAY C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CUDDLY SOFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MORTON J. ROSENBERG
MORTON J. ROSENBERG ROSENBERG, KLEIN & LEE3458 ELLICOTT CENTER DR STE 101ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21043-4178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | BATH LINEN; BATH TOWELS; BEACH TOWELS; BED BLANKETS; BED LINEN; BED PADS; BED SHEETS; BED SHEETS OF PAPER; BED SKIRTS; BED SPREADS; BEDSHEETS; BLANKET THROWS; BLANKETS FOR OUTDOOR USE; CASHMERE BLANKETS; CASHMERE FABRIC; CHEMICAL FIBER FABRICS; CHENILLE FABRIC; CHEVIOT FABRIC; CHILDREN'S BLANKETS; CHILDREN'S TOWELS; COMFORTERS; COTTON FABRIC; COVERLETS; COVERS FOR CUSHIONS; CURTAIN FABRIC; CURTAINS; CURTAINS MADE OF TEXTILE FABRICS; DAMASK; DIMITY; DINING LINENS; DRAPERIES; DUVETS; FABRIC TABLE TOPPERS; FABRIC VALANCES; FABRIC WINDOW COVERINGS AND TREATMENTS, NAMELY CURTAINS, DRAPERIES, SHEERS, SWAGS AND VALANCES; KITCHEN LINENS; KNITTED FABRICS; KNITTED FABRICS OF CHEMICAL-FIBER YARN; KNITTED FABRICS OF COTTON YARN; KNITTED FABRICS OF SILK YARN; LINEN; OVEN MITTS; PET BLANKETS; PILLOW CASES; PILLOW COVERS; PILLOW SHAMS; PILLOWCASES; POLYESTER FABRIC; POT HOLDERS; POUFS; QUILTS; QUILTS OF TEXTILE; RAMIE FABRIC; RAYON FABRIC; RECEIVING BLANKETS; SHOWER CURTAINS; SHOWER ROOM CURTAINS; SILK BED BLANKETS; SILK BLANKETS; SILK CLOTH; SILK FABRIC FOR PRINTING PATTERNS; SILK-COTTON MIXED FABRICS; SILK-WOOL MIXED FABRICS; SPUN SILK FABRICS; SWAGS; SYNTHETIC FIBER FABRICS; TABLE LINEN; TABLE LINEN, NAMELY NAPKINS, PLACE MATS; COASTERS; TABLE MATS NOT OF PAPER; TEXTILE TABLECLOTHS; TEXTILE USED AS LINING FOR CLOTHING; THROWS; VELVET; WOOLEN FABRIC; WOOLEN BLANKETS | ACTIVE | Aug 11, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |