USPTO serial 77601688
FREE FLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARMA, NAPOLEON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FREE FLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Menker
JAMES R. MENKER HOLLEY & MENKER, P.A.PO BOX 331937ATLANTIC BEACH, FL 32233-1715UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Bicycle seat posts; Bicycles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |