USPTO serial 77602145
INFINI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INFINI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joe M. Muncy
JOE M MUNCY MUNCY GEISSLER OLDS & LOWE PLLC4000 LEGATO ROADSUITE 310FAIRFAX, VA 22033Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Bicycle; Bicycle pedals; Bicycle water bottle cages; Bicycle wheels, rims and structural parts therefore; Bicycle pumps; Bicycle gears; Handlebars of two-wheeled motor bicycles; Bicycle kickstands; Bicycle stands; Bicycle parts, namely, fork joints; Bicycle racks for vehicles; Bicycle saddles; Pannier bags for bicycles; Velomobile bodies, namely, specially adapted for weather protection shells for use on bicycles and adult tricycles; Bicycle parts, namely, Crank; Bicycle parts, namely, Direction indicators; Racing bicycles; Bicycle parts, namely, gear wheels; Bicycle parts, namely, drive chains; Bicycle parts, namely, disk wheels; Wheel hubs of two-wheeled motor bicycles; Bicycle parts, namely, handle bar ends; Bicycle parts, namely, brake shoes; Bicycle parts, namely, change-speed gears; Bicycle parts, namely, fork crown covers; Bicycle parts, namely, forks; Bicycle parts, namely, handle bar stems; Bicycle parts, namely, sprockets; Bicycle parts, namely, head stem; Bicycle parts, namely, steering head bearing; Mini-bikes; Mountain bicycle; Mudguards of two-wheeled motor bicycles; Saddle covers for bicycles; Safety pads for bicycles; Spokes for bicycle wheels; Suspension systems for bicycles; Tandem bicycles; Tires of two-wheeled motor bicycles; Baskets adapted for bicycles; Bicycle bell; Bicycle frames; Bicycle handlebar grips; Bicycle horns and Bicycle seat posts | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Sport bags; Sports packs; athletic bags; all purpose carrying bags; Alpenstocks; Attache cases; Baby backpacks; Baby carriers worn on the body; Baby carrying bags; Back frames for carrying children; Backpacks; Backpacks (rucksacks); Bags and holdalls for sports clothing; Bags for umbrellas; Barrel bags; Beach bags; Belt bags; Billfolds; Book bags; Boston bags; Briefcases; Briefcases (leather goods); Bum bags; Business card cases; Carryalls; Carrying cases; Carry-all bags; Carry-on bags; Change purses; Charm bags (omamori-ire); Clutch bags; Clutches (purses); Coin purses; Cosmetic bags sold empty Daypacks; Duffel bags; Duffel bags for travel; Evening handbags; Flexible bags for garments; Gym bags; Handbag frames; Handbags; Haversacks; Hiking bags; Hiking sticks; Hiking rucksacks; Imitation leather; Key bags; Kit bags; Knapsacks; Leather and imitation leather bags; Leather bags for merchandise packaging (envelopes, pouches); Leather bags, suitcases and wallets; Leather cases for keys; Leather key chains; Leather handbags; Leather purses; Leather shopping bags; Leather straps; Luggage tags; Mesh shopping bags; Multi-purpose purses; Overnight bags; Parasols; Pocketbooks; Portmanteaus; Pouches of leather; Roll bags; Satchels; School bags; Shaving bags sold empty; Shoe bags for travel; Shopping bags with wheels attached; Shoulder bags; Shoulder straps; Small backpacks; Souvenir bags; Textile shopping bags; Tool bags sold empty; Tool pouches sold empty; Tote bags; Trunks (luggage); Valises; Vanity cases sold empty; Waist bags and Wallets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |