USPTO serial 77602378
FAIR BIKER DEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FAIR BIKER DEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
40723 Hilden, DE
40723 Hilden, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ursula B. Day
Ursula B. Day Ursula B. Day, Esq708 Third AvenueSuite 1501New York, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | EYE GLASS LENSES; EYE GLASS FRAMES; EYE GLASSES, NAMELY, SUNGLASSES, SPORTS GOGGLES; SAFETY GOGGLES, PROTECTIVE GOGGLES FOR MOTORCYCLING; EYE GLASS LENSES FOR OUTSIDE ATTACHMENT TO EYE GLASSES; SPORTS GOGGLES FOR USE IN THE RAIN; MOTORCYCLE GOGGLES; SKIING GOGGLES; CYCLING GLASSES; DIVING GOGGLES, AND EYE GLASSES FOR CORRECTING DEFECTIVE VISION; PROTECTIVE EYE PIECES, MICROSCOPES CONTAINING EYEPIECES; EYE GLASSES CONTAINING EYE PIECES; OPTICAL GLASSES; EYE GLASS CASES; STRAPS FOR EYE GLASSES; PARTS OF EYE GLASSES IN THE NATURE OF TEMPLE REST PADS; CONTACT LENSES; CRASH HELMETS AND PROTECTIVE HELMETS FOR BICYCLISTS, MOTORCYCLISTS AND SKIERS; GLOVES FOR PROTECTION AGAINST ACCIDENTS; CLOTHING SUITS FOR PROTECTION AGAINST ACCIDENTS IN THE RAIN FOR MOTORCYCLISTS; PROTECTIVE FACE MASKS NOT FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES; PROTECTIVE CLOTHING | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | OVERALLS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 17, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |