USPTO serial 77602407
VCM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VCM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna J. Bunton
DONNA J. BUNTON NIXON & VANDERHYE P.C.901 N GLEBE ROAD11TH FLOORARLINGTON, VA 22203-1853Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | NON-METAL FIBROUS OR FIBER REINFORCED ADVANCED COMPOSITE MATERIALS COMPRISED PRIMARILY OF ANY COMBINATION OF FIBERS, RESINS/POLYMERS, AND CERAMICS IN THE NATURE OF SHEETS, PANELS, AND, SHAPED PANELS AND SUB-PANELS FEATURING MECHANICAL, THERMAL, ELECTRO-MAGNETIC, ACOUSTIC AND OPTIC RELATED SYNTHETIC MATERIAL DESIGNS FOR USE IN ARMOR TECHNOLOGIES INCLUDING THE FURTHER MANUFACTURE OF BODY ARMOR, VEHICLE ARMOR AND LIKE GOODS, AND OTHER PRODUCTS ACROSS A BROAD SPECTRUM OF APPLICATIONS FOR USE IN PROTECTION FOR INDIVIDUALS, VEHICLES, AIRCRAFT, ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE ASSETS | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | BUILDING MATERIALS IN MECHANICAL, THERMAL, ELECTRO-MAGNETIC, ACOUSTIC AND OPTIC RELATED SYNTHETIC MATERIAL DESIGNS, NAMELY, NON-METAL COMPOSITE PANELS AND SHAPED PANELS AND SUB-PANELS FOR USE IN A WIDE RANGE OF APPLICATIONS IN THE ARMOR PROTECTION INDUSTRY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 22, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 30, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 13, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 30, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |